![]() ![]() So it's easier to imply movement with the camera. Mostly because you have to do it over and over again. It also costs more to do a wider take, such as in the Marvel films where their fighting is literally otherworldly, so it takes more to sell it in broader strokes both in fighting and camera capture.īut as for car chases, it's rare when something really, really, risky is being done. ![]() It's actually a lot easier for the actors to do more realistic fight techniques, and then use handheld camera techniques to imply even more overt movement. Asian martial arts films are an exception to this, but Greengrass and the Bourne films are a good example of ushering in the quick cut, realistic fighting that basically everyone does now. The camera is the tool to imply the movement, especially in fight choreography. That's how it's always done, for any type of movement, really. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |